For some undisclosed reason, the LuLu group decided to exit the land deal it entered into with the Cochin Port Trust some years ago. According to the deal, the group took 26 acre land on Bolghatty island from the port trust on a 30-year lease.
The port trust leased the land to the group to build a convention centre and associated facilities. However, the group reportedly planned to build 572 serviced apart
FlashNews:
Delhi Airport Transfer Traffic Hits 27%, Reinforces Hub Status
CleanMax-GACL Seal Gujarat’s Largest Hybrid RE Partnership for Industrial Decarbonisation
Atlanta Electricals Wins ₹2.85 Billion PSTCL Transformer Order
ULCCS Model Gains Global Spotlight at UN Symposium
India Clears ₹100 Billion ATF Stabilisation Package Amid West Asia Crisis
Chasing 70 GW Ambition, Suzlon 2.0 Re‑invents Wind for Energy Transition
Digi Yatra Crosses 100 Million Journeys, Expands Seamless Travel Across 38 Airports
AM/NS India Wins First PM‑SETU Approval, as Andhra Pradesh Leads ITI Transformation
NHAI Finalises Highway Monetisation Plan for FY2026‑27
Sonowal Launches Port Performance Index, Digital Maritime Reforms to Boost Competitiveness
MGL and Fourth Partner Energy Ink MoU for Clean Energy Push
IGIA Deploys SKYCAST, India’s First Next‑Gen All‑Weather Station to Boost Aviation Safety
REC Signs MoU with ERDA to Strengthen Quality Assurance under RDSS
SEIL Energy India Hosts South India’s First C&I Conference
AM/NS India Sets Global Benchmark with Ultra‑High Strength Welded Pipes
CleanMax Raises $575 Million for 1 GW Renewable Push in Rajasthan and Karnataka
ADR Adopted at BRICS Meet, Meghwal Pedals for Sustainability
The New Power Corridor
Mumbai’s Rooftop Solar Revolution: Tata Power Consumers Slash Bills by 50%
Home » LuLu group
Tag: LuLu group
Lulu group decides to exit land deal with port
KCZMA divided on the Bolgatty project
Members of the Kerala Coastal Zone Management Authority (KCZMA) are divided on the issue of whether to allow Emke Group, led by MA Yusuff Ali, to set up the Bolgatty convention centre. The opposing members argue that the clearance should not have been given for a non-port activity in a reclaimed area within a sensitive ecosystem

